<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Exposure value</title> <atom:link href="http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/</link> <description>Digital Camera Help for Beginners &#38; Beyond</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gail</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-4358</link> <dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:34:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-4358</guid> <description>Thank you George. I will take a look at the article and make any necessary adjustment to the above article. Here is an additional reply from out &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technical Editor Bernard Dery&lt;/a&gt;:&quot;I&#039;d say there&#039;s no clear-cut line here (as with snow). It depends on what you want to achieve, which part of the image you want to preserve. On the beach, I honestly never had any problems with exposure, with my three cameras. With white flowers, I tend to overexpose a bit if what interests me is the colour, or underexpose if what interests me are the textures. As for snow, what interests me is generally the textures, which makes me underexpose.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you George. I will take a look at the article and make any necessary adjustment to the above article. Here is an additional reply from out <a
href="../../../../" rel="nofollow">Technical Editor Bernard Dery</a>:</p><p>&#8220;I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s no clear-cut line here (as with snow). It depends on what you want to achieve, which part of the image you want to preserve. On the beach, I honestly never had any problems with exposure, with my three cameras. With white flowers, I tend to overexpose a bit if what interests me is the colour, or underexpose if what interests me are the textures. As for snow, what interests me is generally the textures, which makes me underexpose.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeorgeS</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-4327</link> <dc:creator>GeorgeS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-4327</guid> <description>Take a look at this site:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&amp;articleID=2666&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&amp;articleID=2666&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this site:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&amp;articleID=2666" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&#038;articleID=2666</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gail Bjork</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-4321</link> <dc:creator>Gail Bjork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:04:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-4321</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;George, you make some very interesting points but I&#039;ve personally found the approximate exposure values work for me. Perhaps it&#039;s because in difficult lighting, I may use &lt;a href=&quot;../../../basic-techniques/fe-lock/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;exposure lock&lt;/a&gt; in addition to adjusting Exposure Compensation. I&#039;d be interested to hear any further thoughts on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, you make some very interesting points but I&#8217;ve personally found the approximate exposure values work for me. Perhaps it&#8217;s because in difficult lighting, I may use <a
href="../../../basic-techniques/fe-lock/" rel="nofollow">exposure lock</a> in addition to adjusting Exposure Compensation. I&#8217;d be interested to hear any further thoughts on this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeorgeS</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-4315</link> <dc:creator>GeorgeS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 20:30:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-4315</guid> <description>Correct me if I am wrong, but i think the Exposure suggestions are reversed, in at least the cases for &quot;Snow, beach or highly reflected water&quot; and &quot;Very dark or black objects&quot;. What really happens in these cases, is that the camera is fooled by the discrepancy between the reflectance of snow/water/dark object and the reflectance of a gray card used for the camera&#039;s calibration. In other words, a camera&#039;s measurement of exposure from snow will be less than the optimal exposure because more light is reflected and the camera will tend to let less light enter; the image will need manual OVER-exposure to compensate. Shooting dark/black objects will call for manual UNDER-exposure respectively.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I am wrong, but i think the Exposure suggestions are reversed, in at least the cases for &#8220;Snow, beach or highly reflected water&#8221; and &#8220;Very dark or black objects&#8221;. What really happens in these cases, is that the camera is fooled by the discrepancy between the reflectance of snow/water/dark object and the reflectance of a gray card used for the camera&#8217;s calibration. In other words, a camera&#8217;s measurement of exposure from snow will be less than the optimal exposure because more light is reflected and the camera will tend to let less light enter; the image will need manual OVER-exposure to compensate. Shooting dark/black objects will call for manual UNDER-exposure respectively.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How to take Item Pictures: Camera settings (EV: Exposure Value) &#171; bistro life</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link> <dc:creator>How to take Item Pictures: Camera settings (EV: Exposure Value) &#171; bistro life</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:52:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-1589</guid> <description>[...] I&#8217;m pretty sure this little setting will cure headaches of a lot of sellers. BTW, I found this site and there are several suggested EV setting for everyday [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m pretty sure this little setting will cure headaches of a lot of sellers. BTW, I found this site and there are several suggested EV setting for everyday [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: l3nsta56</title><link>http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-photos/advanced-techniques/ev/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link> <dc:creator>l3nsta56</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:04:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.digicamhelp.com/?p=2697#comment-574</guid> <description>thank you so,so much. you have given me good information.you guys rock!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so,so much. you have given me good information.you guys rock!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 450/452 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.digicamhelp.com @ 2012-02-13 03:05:01 -->
