Photography & Camera Forum - Digicamhelp.com
May 25, 2012, 02:17:04 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: ~ This forum is closed ~
But you can browse any of the 8000+ forum posts...
... or post Comments and Questions throughout the main site.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

megapixels  vs quality

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: megapixels  vs quality  (Read 3443 times)
Tom Little
Guest
« on: July 10, 2004, 09:27:39 AM »

Hi. I have a 5 megapixel sony . I can set it to 5, 3, 2 or 1
meg size as well as fine or standard.

Q) If i set it 2 say 3 meg size, am I only then getting the same quality as a standard 3 megapixel camera or is the quality still that of a 5 mega pixel ccd with a smaller picture output.

Thanks for your help

Tom
Logged
Mike54
Administrator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 969


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2004, 10:55:01 AM »

Hi Tom,

AFAIK using the 3 mega pixel setting will give you the quality of a 3 mega pixel camera. The trade up is that you should be able to get more images on your memory card. The fewer mp the smaller the image will be.
Logged

What's the point of wearing your favorite rocketship underpants if nobody ever asks to see 'em?
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2054



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2004, 09:06:55 AM »

Quote

Q) If i set it 2 say 3 meg size, am I only then getting the same quality as a standard 3 megapixel camera or is the quality still that of a 5 mega pixel ccd with a smaller picture output.


Hi Tom,

I agree with Mike. This is a frequently asked question and here's some additional thinking on it.

Many opine that you obtain the best images when you shoot at the maximum for which a camera is optimized. In other words, if you have a five mp camera, the best quality are those taken at five mp/fine (or TIFF OR RAW).

From a visual standpoint, when viewing on a monitor it's difficult to see the difference if an image shot at a lower megapixel setting. And they are fine if you primarily use your images on the web or send via email.

A two megapixel image will generally to print as well at 4x6" as an image taken at three, five or or eight megapixels. But if you need to crop, it's better to shoot at your digital camera's highest resolution and quality settings. Also, if you want to make a printed enlargement, the more megapixels the better.

Personally, I shoot at the highest jpeg resolution/fine of my digicam. The biggest drawback is I had to buy bigger memory cards. But I never know when I'm going to get a great shot, or if I want to crop or print an enlargement.

By the way, I've printed some great shots taken with my previous two megapixel camera, and some awful shots taken with my current five megapixel digicam. Shocked  Grin  Go figure.

Experiment a little.


Related reading:

Resolution settings for quality prints
http://www.digicamhelp.com/working-with-digital-images/printing-resolution.htm

Image quality:
http://www.digicamhelp.com/taking-pictures/image_quality.htm

Digital image file types
http://www.digicamhelp.com/digital-camera-image-formats/index.htm  
Logged

Tom Little
Guest
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2004, 07:42:40 AM »

 Cheesy
Hi,
Thanks for the reply . The explanation(s)  makes a lot of sense.

I was under the impression that even at a lower megaPixel setting only the "print / screen/storage" size reduced but you were still using all the 5 mp's for the picture. Seeing that I paid for a 5 mp camera I will default all pictures to the highest setting.

Thanks again
Tom
Logged
Photography & Camera Forum - Digicamhelp.com
   


:: HOW TO PHOTOGRAPH A HOME ~ Professional-looking photos help sell homes more quickly! This easy-to-understand, illustrated eBook helps you learn to take photos with a compact digital that stand out from the crowd! eBook only $3.95 ::

 Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: