Photography & Camera Forum - Digicamhelp.com
May 22, 2012, 09:03:02 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: ~ This forum is closed ~
But you can browse any of the 8000+ forum posts...
... or post Comments and Questions throughout the main site.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

true image stabilization

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: true image stabilization  (Read 1681 times)
bill_hilly
New Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1



View Profile
« on: February 14, 2008, 06:18:11 AM »

Before buying an Olympus Stylus 1200 (which jr.com has at a great price-- http://www.jr.com/JRProductPage.process?Product=4194407 --), a friend talked me into switching to a Canon SD850, because it has "optical" image stabilization and the Olympus has "digital" image stabilization.

What is the difference?
Logged

Young old guy who is learning to love photography.
bdery
Moderator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 672



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2008, 05:05:36 PM »

Hi and welcome!

Your friend is correct to point out the difference. Here are the basics.

Optical image stabilization means that either the lens or the sensor have moving elements that are used to compensate for some of the "camera shake" that users can generate. This shake is more visible in low light (when you are exposing the image longer, thus increasing the risk of moving ever so slightly) or when using a somewhat long zoom (every tiny movement is magnified by a long zoom). Image stabilization is not a miracle tool, but can help you take pictures in tricky situations.

Digital image stabilization is, honestly, a mrketing gimmick. All it does, usually, is increase the ISO value (in other words, the gain of your sensor) in order to be able to reduce the exposure time and limit the risk of moving. Doing so, however, increases the level of digital noise in your image. And with compact cameras, the sensors are usually small and VERY sensitive to noise.

Increasing the ISO of he camera can be useful and/or necessary in some situations, but calling it image stabilization is excessive and misleading. That's not to say a camera without "real" image stabilization is bad, but the term "digital image stabilization" is more misleading than it is accurate.

Some helpful readings:

High ISO:  http://www.digicamhelp.com/camera-features/camera-modes/high-sensitivity-mode.php

Image stabilization : http://www.digicamhelp.com/camera-features/camera-parts/image-stabilization.php
Logged

Be happy to be alive. It gives you a chance to love, have some fun, and see the stars.
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2054



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2008, 02:34:29 AM »

Here is some information related to the excellent explanation provided by bdrey"

http://dev.digicamhelp.coms/gimmicks/is-terms.php
Logged

ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2054



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2008, 02:08:44 AM »

Just to point out that some cameras have "dual image stabilization."

This is not two forms of hardware based Image Stabilization (IS0) but a combination of optical IS and an increase to ISO.  The cameras has a dual Image Stabilization mode so the IS and ISO work together automatically.
Logged

Photography & Camera Forum - Digicamhelp.com
   


:: HOW TO PHOTOGRAPH A HOME ~ Professional-looking photos help sell homes more quickly! This easy-to-understand, illustrated eBook helps you learn to take photos with a compact digital that stand out from the crowd! eBook only $3.95 ::

 Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: