Hi, just thought I'd add .............
If you are doing telephoto work and your lens is standard (not DX or EF-S), then the conversion factor found with some digital SLRs is quite an advantage. In effect, you get more telephoto capability without having to invest in a more powerful lens.
If, however, you mostly do wide-angle work (deep landscapes, etc.), then the conversion factor is disadvantageous and you either would want to get a wider angle lens or a DX/EF-S version to achieve the same effect you would have gotten using the same lens on a standard SLR.
Whether or not to invest in DX or EF-S lenses or non-DX/EF-S lenses is the question. For example, in my case, I don't invest in DX lenses because I use my lenses on a variety of bodies both digital and film (with and without a conversion factor). Others really love their DX or EF-S lenses and get fantastic results on their digital SLR bodies.

PS: "DX" is Nikon's designation for those lenses which are specially designed to compensate for certain digital SLRs with magnifaction factors (ie. DX format digital SLRs). Canon uses the designation "EF-S" for their lenses which fit their non-full frame digital SLRs (Digital Rebel).