cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« on: November 14, 2005, 05:27:36 PM » |
|
This is one of the first pics I took with my new Canon G6 and 420EX flash. It's not exactly quite the quality I hoped for so I'm looking for tips. I shot it with the flash bounced at 60 degrees, Tv Mode (1/125), AWB. Here is a link to the picture: http://www.pbase.com/cjanda/image/52196767.jpgThanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2005, 06:16:21 PM » |
|
FYI -- here is the full shooting info for the pic:
File Name IMG_0060.JPG Camera Model Name Canon PowerShot G6 Shooting Date/Time 11/12/05 13:25:04 Shooting Mode Shutter Speed Priority AE Photo Effect Off Tv (Shutter Speed) 1/125 Av (Aperture Value) 3.0 Light Metering Evaluative Exposure Compensation 0 ISO Speed 50 Lens 7.2 - 28.8mm Focal Length 28.8mm Digital Zoom None Image Size 3072x2304 Image Quality Fine Flash On Flash Type External E-TTL Flash Exposure Compensation +2/3 Shutter curtain sync 1st-curtain White Balance Auto AF Mode Continuous AF Color Space sRGB File Size 2412KB Drive Mode Single-frame shooting
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2054
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2005, 03:27:24 AM » |
|
Hi cjanda and welcome to the Q&A Board! What are the things you are looking for in terms of quality? The image looks quite nice to me. One of the benefits of using an external flash really shows in that there are no harsh shadows behind the subjects. If it's the slight color cast that you're concerned about, then you need to adjust the white balance according to the main source of lighting in the room. You have it set to auto, perhaps you should have used incandescent or flash white balance. Better yet is to do a custom white balance. You can remove the color cast with image editing software. The only other thing I'd do if it were my photo, would be to sharpen it slightly using Unsharp Mask. If you had other concerns, let us know. Related reading: Removing a color cast (this is a very basic tutorial) http://www.digicamhelp.com/correcting-digital-photo-color-cast/Unsharp maskhttp://www.digicamhelp.com/learn/image-editing/image-sharpening.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2054
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2005, 03:46:18 AM » |
|
I did some quick editing (color correction and unsharp mask) to show you what can be done through the wonder of the digital darkroom: http://www.pbase.com/gailb/image/52299502
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2005, 09:32:25 AM » |
|
Yes .. wow... thanks so much for the information and the example!
I do have Photoshop Elements 3 on my Mac -- but I guess I'm trying to get the images better right out of the camera. Maybe I'm expecting too much in that respect ??
Yes -- the issues I had with the photo were mainly that it seemed to lack sharpness most of all and it had a color cast to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Deb
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 1455
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2005, 11:07:16 AM » |
|
Hi Cjanda, yep, digital camera images do seem to be softer (less sharp). This is normal. With digital images, you apply an unsharp mask (or sharpen by whatever technique you prefer such as sharpen edges, Nik Sharpener, etc.) appropriate for the size of print you are making. You'll want to avoid using too much in-camera sharpening. If you're only going to be using your images for say 4x6 inch prints and don't intend to enlarge them, then you can get away with using in-camera sharpening a bit more aggressively. In this case, you can go ahead and increase the amount of in-camera sharpening if you want. But remember, you'll be limiting your original image file's post-processing potential. The choice is up to you. It all depends on your individual needs.
As for the color cast, what you were getting was a typical warm-cast set by the camera's auto white balance feature. If you prefer cooler looking images, then go ahead and manually select a white balance setting that will give you the results you like. Some camera's also allow you to fine-tune the white balance setting. Look for a customizable white balance feature. You might like to play with this as well to achieve the look you want.
Have fun!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2005, 04:12:49 PM » |
|
Thank you Deb !
Ok.. here's a stupid question -- why is it called an UNsharp mask if what you are doing is SHARPENING the image ?
Forgive me for the newbie question, please.
Thx again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2005, 05:53:17 PM » |
|
Hi cjanda and welcome to the Q&A Board! What are the things you are looking for in terms of quality? The image looks quite nice to me. One of the benefits of using an external flash really shows in that there are no harsh shadows behind the subjects. If it's the slight color cast that you're concerned about, then you need to adjust the white balance according to the main source of lighting in the room. You have it set to auto, perhaps you should have used incandescent or flash white balance. Better yet is to do a custom white balance. You can remove the color cast with image editing software. The only other thing I'd do if it were my photo, would be to sharpen it slightly using Unsharp Mask. If you had other concerns, let us know. Related reading: Removing a color cast (this is a very basic tutorial) http://www.digicamhelp.com/correcting-digital-photo-color-cast/Unsharp maskhttp://www.digicamhelp.com/learn/image-editing/image-sharpening.htmI found this very helpful too in figuring out how and which things to adjust in the Unmask filter: http://www.webreference.com/graphics/elements2/4.htmlHere is the same image after I tried my hand at adjusting the color cast and using the Unsharpen filter: http://www.pbase.com/cjanda/image/52326254.jpgThanks again! Jeff.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2005, 05:56:04 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2005, 06:19:58 PM » |
|
And one more.. a little different -- my favorite. http://www.pbase.com/cjanda/image/52327347Thanks so much for getting me going in the right direction (at least I think I'm going in the right direction -- correct me if not !!!).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2054
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2005, 02:56:57 AM » |
|
Outstanding! It's amazing what a few clicks can do to improve an image.
Don't forget to do some experimentation with white balance settings when taking photos. In the G6 Photo Effect menu, you can change the sharpness setting though I generally don't recommend increasing it unless you do no post processing (editing) at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Deb
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 1455
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2005, 09:45:47 AM » |
|
... why is it called an UNsharp mask if what you are doing is SHARPENING the image ? That's a dandy question. Actually Unsharp Mask gets its name from a "sharpening" process used in wet darkrooms when working with film negatives. For a discussion and translation of that process to the digital darkroom, you might like to read these indepth articles: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/understanding-usm.shtmland http://www.bythom.com/sharpening.htm#contrast  Also, I took a look at your editted photos. GREAT JOB!!! I, too, am partial to the last version. You did a splendid job of maintaining the warmth of the scene. Way to go! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjanda
New Member
Offline
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2005, 05:34:57 PM » |
|
Just for comparison .. this photo was also shot the same day. This one is straight out of the camera -- not touched at all. I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's a keeper :-) http://www.pbase.com/cjanda/image/52440390
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ShutterbugGail
Global Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2054
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2005, 05:48:05 PM » |
|
It certainly is a keeper! What a wonderful photo of an adorable little girl! It's great right out of the camera and should print very well. If you want to add a little more "zing" to the image, for presentation on the web try some slight sharpening and minor adjusting of brightness and contrast. As to the latter, I like to use levels. Other than resizing an image, these are the two editing techniques I apply to every image. Of course, it's all a matter of personal taste. Congratulations on the lovely photo. Related reading: Levelshttp://www.digicamhelp.com/what-is-a-histogram/levels-histogram.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Photography & Camera Forum - Digicamhelp.com
|
:: HOW TO PHOTOGRAPH A HOME ~ Professional-looking photos help sell homes more quickly! This easy-to-understand, illustrated eBook helps you learn to take photos with a compact digital that stand out from the crowd! eBook only $3.95 ::
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|