Home > Digital Camera Blogs > DSLR dilemma > DSLR image stabilization
Gail's DSLR dilemma Blog
DSLR image stabilization
Image stabilization is a must have feature when I buy a new digital camera.
With compact digital cameras, the choice was easy. Get optical image stabilization, not digital [learn why]. But with digital single lens reflex cameras, deciding is a lot more difficult.
There are two types of DSLR image stabilization: IS built into the camera body and IS built into individual lenses. There are compelling arguments for each, and like most everything, when it comes to digital cameras, there are cons too.
Image stabilization in a DSLR body
Pros:
- Every lens you attach to the camera, whether old or new, gets stabilized.
- Interchangeable lenses without image stabilization generally cost less.
- You can see the effects of IS when using Live View.
Cons:
- May not provide optimal performance for all lenses, especially telephoto lenses.
- When looking through the viewfinder, the image isn't stabilized. Some DSLRs do display a small graph showing the amount of camera movement.
Image stabilized interchangeable lenses
Pros
- Helps you frame a shot better, especially with telephoto lenses.
- When looking through the viewfinder, the actual image is stabilized.
- Image stabilization is tailored to each lens.
Cons
- Lenses with built-in IS are generally bigger and heavier.
- Lenses with built-in IS are more expensive.
My take:
There is a vast difference of opinion between photographers about which DSLR image stabilization is best. From what I’ve read, I believe lens-based stabilization has the edge. But I haven’t been convinced that lens-based IS is way much better, particularly considering the added cost and weight. However, if long telephoto lenses will be used, in-lens image stabilization would be my preference.
